The Relationship Between Parents and Adolescent Children in Contemporary Society

Article written in collaboration with @psicologa_giuliamoretti

Parents and Adolescents in Contemporary Society

Raising an adolescent child in contemporary society represents a complex challenge that involves psychological, relational, cultural, and social dimensions. Parents are required to perform their role within a context characterized by rapid change, where values, educational models, and normative references are less stable than in the past. The family is no longer the sole educational agency, but shares this role with schools, peer groups, and, above all, the digital world. In this scenario, the parent–child relationship must continuously reorganize itself, adapting to new demands and evolving developmental needs. Adolescence, in particular, disrupts previous family equilibria, making it necessary to redefine roles, boundaries, and communication styles. Parents may experience feelings of uncertainty, fatigue, and sometimes inadequacy when faced with behaviors that appear contradictory or unpredictable. However, the literature emphasizes that this phase also represents an opportunity for mutual growth and transformation of the relational bond (Steinberg, 2014).

From a developmental perspective, adolescence is a transitional phase between childhood and adulthood, characterized by profound biological, emotional, and cognitive changes. These transformations directly influence how adolescents perceive themselves, others, and especially their parents. The need for autonomy and differentiation becomes central, often leading to a questioning of parental authority. This process should not be interpreted as a rejection of the bond, but rather as a functional reorganization that supports identity development. Nevertheless, parents may experience this shift as a loss of control or as emotional distance. The challenge lies in maintaining a meaningful presence without becoming intrusive, supporting autonomy without relinquishing the educational role. Numerous studies highlight that the quality of the parent–child relationship remains a crucial factor for adolescent psychological well-being, even when the relationship appears more conflictual or distant (Laursen & Collins, 2009).

Contemporary society emphasizes values such as self-realization, performance, and individual success, which may influence parental expectations toward their children. Adolescents often perceive high pressure to “function,” to make early choices, and to demonstrate competence, even when their emotional development is still ongoing. This discrepancy between external demands and internal maturation can generate stress, anxiety, and feelings of inadequacy. In this context, the parental role as a secure base becomes even more relevant. Providing a relational space in which adolescents feel accepted, understood, and not judged represents a fundamental protective factor. The family relationship continues to influence the development of emotional and social competencies well into adolescence. Understanding the sociocultural context in which adolescents grow is therefore essential for interpreting their behaviors and supporting their developmental process (Arnett, 2015).

Physical, Emotional, and Cognitive Transformations in Adolescence

Adolescence is characterized by profound physical transformations, primarily related to pubertal and hormonal changes. Growth spurts and sexual maturation represent visible and often rapid changes that can influence body image and self-esteem. Sex hormones such as testosterone and estrogen significantly impact not only physical development but also mood regulation and emotional responsiveness. These biological changes may increase adolescents’ vulnerability to emotional fluctuations and psychological distress. Additionally, changes in sleep patterns and circadian rhythms contribute to fatigue and irritability. Parents may interpret these signals as laziness or oppositional behavior, without recognizing their biological basis. Understanding the physical dimension of adolescent development allows for a more empathetic and less judgmental perspective (Sisk & Foster, 2004; Steinberg, 2014).

On an emotional level, adolescence is a period marked by heightened emotional intensity and variability. Emotions are experienced more strongly and often with limited regulatory capacity. Adolescents are particularly sensitive to social evaluation and to the need for peer acceptance. This heightened sensitivity increases vulnerability to rejection, criticism, and social comparison. At the same time, the need to construct a coherent and autonomous identity becomes increasingly salient. Parents may perceive these emotional fluctuations as excessive or difficult to manage. However, research shows that such characteristics are integral to the emotional and identity development process. A family environment that offers emotional validation and attentive listening promotes the gradual development of self-regulation skills (Casey et al., 2010; Crone & Dahl, 2012).

From a cognitive perspective, adolescence involves significant development of executive functions and abstract thinking. The prefrontal cortex, responsible for planning, impulse control, and decision-making, is still undergoing maturation. As a result, adolescents may demonstrate advanced reasoning abilities while struggling to translate them into consistent behavior. Moral reasoning and metacognitive skills develop progressively but remain influenced by emotional states and contextual factors. Parents may observe impulsive or seemingly contradictory behaviors. These manifestations do not reflect a lack of ability, but rather a brain that is still under construction. Understanding the cognitive limitations and potentials of adolescents is essential for adjusting expectations and educational demands (Blakemore & Choudhury, 2006; Luna et al., 2010).

The Adolescent Brain: Balancing Emotion and Control

Neuroscientific research has significantly contributed to understanding adolescent behavior. One of the central findings concerns the different timing of maturation across brain structures. Limbic regions, involved in emotional processing, motivation, and reward, mature earlier than the prefrontal cortex. This neurobiological imbalance increases adolescents’ sensitivity to emotional stimuli and immediate rewards. Consequently, impulsive behaviors, novelty seeking, and risk-taking tendencies become more prevalent. Parents may interpret these behaviors as irresponsible or provocative. However, they reflect a normative phase of brain development. A neurodevelopmental framework helps reduce blame and promotes more effective educational strategies (Steinberg, 2010).

The heightened reactivity of the reward system makes adolescents particularly sensitive to social feedback. Peer approval often assumes greater importance than parental judgment. This dynamic can lead to decisions that appear irrational from an adult perspective. In reality, the adolescent brain is oriented toward exploration and learning through experience. The parental role, therefore, becomes one of containment, guidance, and boundary setting to reduce major risks. The presence of a stable and supportive relationship contributes to the gradual development of self-regulatory capacities. Longitudinal studies show that an authoritative parenting style is associated with better behavioral adjustment over time (Steinberg et al., 2009).

Awareness of adolescent brain functioning allows for a reconsideration of the educational meaning of rules. Limits should not be viewed as rigid control mechanisms, but as external supports for internal regulation that is still immature. Explaining rules, negotiating them, and making them understandable promotes gradual internalization of boundaries. This process helps adolescents develop decision-making skills and a sense of responsibility. Parents thus act as temporary “external regulators.” Consistency and predictability in adult responses are crucial. A structured yet flexible family environment represents a significant protective factor (Blakemore, 2012).

The Transformation of the Parental Role

Over the past decades, the parental role has undergone a profound transformation. Traditional educational models, based on authority and obedience, have given way to more dialogical styles oriented toward emotional understanding. This change reflects an increased attention to children’s psychological needs and their emotional well-being. However, it has also introduced new complexities in managing educational boundaries. Many parents struggle to maintain an authoritative position without feeling authoritarian. The fear of damaging the relationship can lead to a reduction in educational firmness. The literature emphasizes that balancing emotional warmth and control remains central for healthy development (Baumrind, 1991).

Research on parenting and family dynamics highlights that, starting from the traditional authoritarian and normative model, more complex models have emerged. In the authoritarian family, the parent–child relationship was primarily based on obedience and rule transmission, leaving little space for children’s emotional expression. This model ensured order and discipline but limited the autonomy and the ability of children to manage their emotional experiences (Palombo, 2005). Subsequently, with increased attention to developmental psychology and children’s emotional well-being, the model of the narcissistic family emerged, as described by Lancini (2023) and other contemporary psychology authors. In this configuration, parents tend to place the child’s Self at the center, idealizing it and interpreting their role as necessary for the child’s happiness and fulfillment. Although the intention is positive, this model can generate strong pressure on children, who perceive parental expectations as implicit constraints or as measures of their own worth (Kohut, 1971).

In his essay Be Yourself My Way: Being Adolescents in the Era of Adult Fragility, Matteo Lancini (2023) describes a paradox that has emerged in contemporary adult–youth relationships: adolescents are asked to be themselves, but “in the way” adults expect. This means that children’s authenticity is encouraged only within the boundaries of parents’ implicit expectations and desires. Young people are urged to express their individuality, but always in ways that reassure adults, confirm their beliefs, or satisfy their anxieties. In this sense, what appears as freedom of expression transforms into a binding form of relationship, where the construction of identity is influenced by others’ needs rather than by the authentic perception of the Self (Lancini, 2023; State of Mind, 2023).

This dynamic is reflected in the configuration of the so-called post-narcissistic family. In this model, the ideal of authenticity persists but does not coincide with a genuine recognition of the other as an autonomous person. Parents, while appearing empathetic and available, continue to project their anxieties, expectations, and vulnerabilities onto their children, creating a situation in which adolescents are encouraged to be authentic, but only insofar as their authenticity does not conflict with the reassurance or emotional needs of adults (Lancini, 2023). The post-narcissistic family, therefore, differs from the previous narcissistic family in that it is no longer a direct, idealizing investment in the child’s Self but a more subtle and pervasive dynamic: the child must adapt their identity to a form of conditioned authenticity, which may create difficulties in recognizing and fully living their own Self, increasing the risk of identity confusion and emotional distress (Lancini, 2023; Kohut, 1971). In this context, the concept of “Be Yourself My Way” succinctly captures the central tension of contemporary parenting: children are encouraged to develop autonomy and originality, yet the boundaries between genuine listening and implicit control remain blurred, making the educational task more complex and requiring parents to continuously reflect on their expectations and their emotional role in their children’s lives (Lancini, 2023; State of Mind, 2023).

Being a parent of adolescents also implies confronting one’s own emotions and personal history. Conflicts with children can reactivate unresolved experiences or individual vulnerabilities. In some cases, parents may perceive the child’s autonomy as a loss or as a threat to the bond. This can lead to overprotective responses or, conversely, emotional withdrawal. The ability to reflect on one’s role and emotional reactions is fundamental. A reflective attitude allows distinguishing between the adolescent’s needs and the parent’s needs. Parenting during adolescence, therefore, requires a continual renegotiation of the relationship (Fonagy et al., 2002).

The concept of the “good enough” parent, introduced by Winnicott, is particularly useful in this phase. It is not about being perfect or always available but about offering an authentic and reliable presence. Mistakes and misunderstandings are part of the educational process. What matters is the ability to repair, recognize one’s limits, and maintain open communication. Adolescents benefit from adult models that show consistency but also humanity. The parent–child relationship thus becomes a space for reciprocal learning. This approach fosters the development of autonomy and emotional security (Winnicott, 1965).

Parent–Adolescent Conflict in Contemporary Society

Conflict between parents and adolescents is a normative and developmentally functional phenomenon. However, in contemporary society, conflict often takes different forms than in the past. While it was previously more explicit and openly expressed, today it tends to be quieter and more internalized. Many adolescents avoid confrontation, opting instead for emotional withdrawal or silence. This shift may be influenced by cultural contexts that prioritize harmony and discourage open disagreement. Parents may interpret the absence of conflict as a positive sign. In reality, silence may conceal unmet needs and feelings of loneliness. Understanding these new forms of conflict is essential for effective intervention (Smetana, 2011).

Adolescents may perceive parents as fragile, stressed, or unavailable for listening. In response, they may choose to manage difficulties independently to avoid adding further tension. This strategy may foster apparent autonomy but reduce opportunities for support and dialogue. When managed constructively, conflict represents an important opportunity for relational growth. It allows for negotiation of rules, expression of needs, and establishment of new balances. Parents play a key role in legitimizing dissent and creating a safe space for disagreement. Tolerance of conflict is a crucial parental competence during adolescence (Laursen & Collins, 2009).

A family climate characterized by open communication and mutual respect supports more adaptive conflict management. Active listening, emotional validation, and clear explanations of rules help reduce the intensity of tensions. Adolescents who perceive parents as available and consistent demonstrate stronger emotional and social competencies. The parental relationship continues to serve as a secure base even during periods of distance. Focusing on relationship quality rather than conflict avoidance is a central educational goal. In this sense, conflict should be viewed not as failure, but as an integral part of development (Sroufe, 2005).

Bibliographic References 

Arnett, J. J. (2015). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Baumrind, D. (1991). The influence of parenting style on adolescent competence and substance use. Journal of Early Adolescence, 11(1), 56–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431691111004

Blakemore, S. J. (2012). Imaging brain development: The adolescent brain. NeuroImage, 61(2), 397–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.11.080

Blakemore, S. J., & Choudhury, S. (2006). Development of the adolescent brain: Implications for executive function and social cognition. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47(3–4), 296–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01611.x

Casey, B. J., Jones, R. M., & Hare, T. A. (2010). The adolescent brain. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1124(1), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1440.010

Crone, E. A., & Dahl, R. E. (2012). Understanding adolescence as a period of social–affective engagement and goal flexibility. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 13(9), 636–650. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3313

Fonagy, P., Gergely, G., Jurist, E. L., & Target, M. (2002). Affect regulation, mentalization, and the development of the self. Other Press.

Fonagy, P., Steele, M., Steele, H., Moran, G., & Higgitt, A. (1991). Parental reflective functioning and attachment. Infant Mental Health Journal. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16210239/?utm

Laursen, B., & Collins, W. A. (2009). Parent–child relationships during adolescence. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (3rd ed., pp. 3–42). Wiley.

Lancini, M. (2023). Sii te stesso a modo mio. Essere adolescenti nell’epoca della fragilità adulta. Raffaello Cortina Editore. https://ferrifamilybooks.altervista.org/sii-te-stesso-a-modo-mio-matteo-lancini/?utm

Luna, B., Padmanabhan, A., & O’Hearn, K. (2010). What has fMRI told us about the development of cognitive control through adolescence? Brain and Cognition, 72(1), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2009.08.005

Maccoby, E. E., & Martin, J. A. (1983). Socialization in the context of the family: Parent–child interaction. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 1–101). Wiley.

Pinquart, M. (2017). Associations of parenting styles with psychosocial outcomes: A meta-analysis. Developmental Psychology. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43576-024-00137-1?utm

Sisk, C. L., & Foster, D. L. (2004). The neural basis of puberty and adolescence. Nature Neuroscience, 7(10), 1040–1047. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1326

Smetana, J. G. (2011). Adolescents, families, and social development: How teens construct their worlds. Wiley-Blackwell.

Sroufe, L. A. (2005). Attachment and development: A prospective, longitudinal study from birth to adulthood. Attachment & Human Development, 7(4), 349–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616730500365928

Steinberg, L. (2010). A dual systems model of adolescent risk-taking. Developmental Psychobiology, 52(3), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.20445

Steinberg, L. (2014). Age of opportunity: Lessons from the new science of adolescence. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

Steinberg, L., Darling, N., & Fletcher, A. (2009). Authoritative parenting and adolescent adjustment. Child Development, 70(3), 749–761.

Watson, P. J., Little, T. D., & Biderman, M. (1992). Narcissism and parenting styles. Psychoanalytic Psychology. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232456378_Narcissism_and_parenting_styles?utm

Winnicott, D. W. (1965). The maturational processes and the facilitating environment. Hogarth Press.